By Diana West
If we ever understand the spread of Islam into heretofore non-Islamic societies as the spread of Islamic law, rather than the spread of just another “religion,” we might actually perceive the danger it poses to our own law and liberty — and act accordingly. This means, for starters, halting Islamic immigration as a means of preventing the adoption of sharia by popular demand. As we can see in Britain, where sharia courts are now recognized by the government, a Muslim population of just 3 percent can produce a lot of popular demand. Whether this understanding comes in demographic time is the big question.
Meanwhile, back at the White House, it’s Ramadan time, which, of course, is universally treated and regarded as merely a religious holiday for the White House to celebrate with constituent-worshippers, OIC ambasaadors, even the occasional unindicted co-conspirator. But if we think beyond the generic notion of religious diversity and consider the specific ramifications of Islamic law, questions begin to dawn. Some heretofore unimagined number of the guests supping with the president must be proponents of the spread of islamic law, no? Even the spread of Islamic law… in the United States?