Barack Hussein Obama (mmm, mmm, good - can’t you just see the chubby Campbell’s soup kids every time you watch him 1) never makes a move without some ulterior purpose. Our Commander-in-Chef now has his wife, the lovely and dangerously-armed (what gives with this arm obsession in the media?) Michelle cooking up some new liberal scheme to feed his favorite food - greenbacks - to a few of his faithful friends, and he is doing it while claiming to be working for the public welfare.

Barack Hussein Obama (mmm, mmm, good - can’t you just see the chubby Campbell’s soup kids every time you watch him http://www.tvacres.com/admascots_campbells.htm) never makes a move without some ulterior purpose. Our Commander-in-Chef now has his wife, the lovely and dangerously-armed (what gives with this arm obsession in the media?) Michelle cooking up some new liberal scheme to feed his favorite food - greenbacks - to a few of his faithful friends, and he is doing it while claiming to be working for the public welfare.

Ed Lynch isn’t just a Republican candidate with the only upcoming special election in the nation.  Ed Lynch is as a man whose personal example embodies the very best of the Republican Party. 

Lynch is no ordinary candidate.  After all, what candidate, two weeks before a primary vote, decides to leave his district in favor of leading a rescue mission in Haiti?  But that episode, more than any other, demonstrates what Ed Lynch is all about.

I’m a candidate myself and have consulted for many conservative campaigns throughout North America.  I’ve known several great conservative candidates well.  I do not know Adam Andrzejewski personally, but I’ve come to greatly admire his campaign.  One does not need to know him in order to see what a benefit he can be to Illinois and to the nation. 

A third generation Illinois-born American, Adam is a 40 year old conservative who embodies the very meaning of the word.  He has a strong work ethic, a clear sense on policy, a passionate belief in the best of people and a strong desire to turn his state around for the better.

The American political process is often characterized as a “two-party” system, implying that members of the electorate will belong to either the Republicans or the Democrats. However, the reality is at least half and often more of participating voters in election are actually independents who hold no real affiliation. Although political parties are a useful instrument to allow the organization of political candidate’s campaigns and their alliances with others, they must not be confused as being an end goal in themselves.

Americans are so sick and tired of Republicans and Conservatives that decide because they disagree with other folks on The Right on a single issue, or the way they said something, that a posse must be organized to run them out of town. Folks that would otherwise be allies have gone for the throat over disagreements on if the Republican Party is worth saving, and have participated in vicious attacks that erupted over how big the opening to the Republican Tent ought to be.

Conservatives claim to believe in limited government on the federal level, while supporting a belief that the legal industry should be made to comply with federal tort reform standards, or that no child should be left behind with compassionate federal legislation. Republicans will claim to support our rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, while compromising life with wishy-washy abortion provisions, or sabotaging liberty with amendments to a health care bill that should be killed where it stands, or supporting regulations on businesses that make it more difficult to pursue the happiness of success in a free market that is constantly under assault by an unconstitutional flurry of federal restrictions.

]]>http://www.americandailyreview.com/us-world-politics/rss-comments-entry-6407935.xmlDouglas V. GibbsFri, 22 Jan 2010 17:37:00 +0000http://www.americandailyreview.com/us-world-politics/2010/1/22/eeoc-nominee-chai-feldblum-society-should-not-tolerate-priva.html292998:4022187:6407951By Douglas V. Gibbs

President Obama’s nomination for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission head is Chai R. Feldblum, a law professor at Georgetown University Law School. She wrote in 2006 that society should “not tolerate” any “private beliefs,” including religious beliefs, that may negatively affect homosexual “equality.”

Feldblum’s “radical” beliefs fit in lockstep (or should I say “goose-step”) with Obama’s school safety czar, and gay pedophile, Kevin Jennings. The view these people have is based on a “zero-sum game” between religion and homosexuality that ultimately provides that “a gain for one side necessarily entails a corresponding loss for the other side.”

I suppose this explains liberal Tom’s proclamation that “our movement will bury you.” It is an all or nothing game for the gay agenda, and their militant thuggery is because of the “winner take all” attitude of the agenda.

]]>http://www.americandailyreview.com/us-world-politics/rss-comments-entry-6407951.xmlDouglas V. GibbsThu, 21 Jan 2010 17:42:00 +0000http://www.americandailyreview.com/us-world-politics/2010/1/21/obama-the-destroyer.html292998:4022187:6407971By Douglas V. Gibbs

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) was asked “where specifically does the Constitution grant Congress the authority to enact an individual health insurance mandate?” by a reporter last October, and in response Speaker Pelosi shook her head and replied: “Are you serious? Are you serious?” She then went on to seek out a different question, one more to her liking. Later, Pelosi was pressed for a more substantive response, and rather have the guts to face America, Pelosi’s sent out a press spokesman to admonish the reporter, saying: “You can put this on the record. That is not a serious question. That is not a serious question.”

This kind of ignorance, or purposeful disregard, of the U.S. Constitution regarding a mandate to buy health insurance is nothing new. ]]>http://www.americandailyreview.com/us-world-politics/rss-comments-entry-6407971.xmlDouglas V. GibbsWed, 20 Jan 2010 17:44:00 +0000http://www.americandailyreview.com/us-world-politics/2010/1/20/storms-end.html292998:4022187:6407983By Douglas V. Gibbs

The skies are filled with the brooding thickness of a stormy morning. Rain is pounding the steel roof of my office, blurring the image of the world through the window’s glass pane. The vicious flooding on the streets brings with it a renewal of much needed life-nourishing water. The growth of indigenous weeds are rising alongside green blades of new grass through the soaked lawn out front that was browning from the thirst of a drought only days before. The Siberian Husky has retreated to the safety of her dog house, and the palm tree stands tall, dripping from the onslaught of a week’s worth of much needed moisture.

With the needed rain comes a destructive force, as well. Hillsides stripped of ground-cover from last season’s fires are sliding downward, pouring mud onto the neighborhoods below. Creeks are flooding over, and storm drains can’t seem to eliminate the water fast enough from major intersections flooded with impatient traffic carrying bodies that are desperately trying to get to work. Trees have fallen, and automobile accidents have dotted the highways. But perhaps the most destructive part of the storms is the least explored consequence of all.

]]>http://www.americandailyreview.com/us-world-politics/rss-comments-entry-6407983.xmlDouglas V. GibbsTue, 19 Jan 2010 17:47:00 +0000http://www.americandailyreview.com/us-world-politics/2010/1/19/personhood-should-be-pro-lifes-theme.html292998:4022187:6407989By Douglas V. Gibbs

Abortion is an issue of life and death, rather than a choice of disposal, according to the Pro-Life movement. Life is precious, and the genocide of humans, even the unborn, is unacceptable in a society that claims to be humane, and concerned with protecting lives.

Each year pro-life groups “March for Life,” and this year on the January 22 anniversary of the 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision, the theme is “personhood.”

Unborn babies are children at the earliest stage of life. Persons. And the right to life must be afforded to the unborn no differently than it is to all Americans.

The “personhood” movement has reached into 32 states, and the introduction of personhood statutes is on the rise. The goal is to end abortion in America, state by state.

]]>http://www.americandailyreview.com/us-world-politics/rss-comments-entry-6407989.xml